Legal Opinion

State v. Lovato

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1994No. 14829, 14716PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLORES, Judge.

In these consolidated appeals, Defendant Mary Esther Lovato (Mary Esther) appeals from her conviction for possession of heroin and Defendant James Lovato (James) appeals from his convictions for trafficking heroin, conspiracy to commit trafficking, and possession of drug paraphernalia. Both Mary Esther and James raise the following issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in denying their motion to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of a search warrant which was stale; and (2) alternatively, whether the search warrant was facially invalid because it…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. DonaldsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. State v. CopelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. State v. PostNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. BarkerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. EsguerraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. SteinzigNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. WhitleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. RubioNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State v. LujanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API