Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hartzell v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1939No. 27497. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

This is an action in mandamus to compel the city of Seattle to pay additional compensation of one-half day’s pay for work on Sundays and holidays performed by respondents during the three years prior to the commencement of the action.

In their application for a writ of mandate, respondents allege that they are regular employees of the city of Seattle, holding positions of linemen in the department of lighting; that certain ordinances of the city of Seattle fix their compensation at a definite daily wage with provisions for payment of additional pay for work on Sundays and holidays; and that,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ausburn v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Chatfield v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Bradford v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Rudnick v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Ross v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Watkins v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API