State Ex Rel. Hartzell v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.
This is an action in mandamus to compel the city of Seattle to pay additional compensation of one-half day’s pay for work on Sundays and holidays performed by respondents during the three years prior to the commencement of the action.
In their application for a writ of mandate, respondents allege that they are regular employees of the city of Seattle, holding positions of linemen in the department of lighting; that certain ordinances of the city of Seattle fix their compensation at a definite daily wage with provisions for payment of additional pay for work on Sundays and holidays; and that,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ausburn v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Chatfield v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Bradford v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Rudnick v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Ross v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Watkins v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1940