Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. London Guaranty & Accident Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 27, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnAMS, J.

In the courts of common law the plaintiff was required to make out his case by the evidence of witnesses or the admissions of the defendant. The right to enforce discovery was a prerogative of the Court of Chancery. By the exercise of this right the court provided effectual means of ascertaining the truth with justice to the plaintiff and without wrong to the party examined. The plaintiff was entitled to the discovery of all facts material to' his case, but the question of materiality was largely determinable by tbe plaintiff’s interrogatories and tbe statement in bis bill. Tbe defendant was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Evans v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Merchants National Bank v. NewtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Burleson Mica Co. v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Girard National Bank v. McArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Ross v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Firemen's Mutual Insurance v. High Point Sprinkler Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Star Manufacturing Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Vaughan v. BroadfootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Tillis v. Calvine Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API