Legal Opinion

Firemen's Mutual Insurance v. High Point Sprinkler Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1966No. 702PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

The policy issued by the plaintiff to the Desk Company was in the standard form prescribed by the statute. G.S. 58-176. It provided: “Subrogation. This Company may require from the insured an assignment of all right of recovery against any party for loss to the extent that payment therefor is made by this Company.” Both by virtue of this provision in the policy and upon equitable principles the plaintiff, having paid the loss to the Desk Company pursuant to the policy, is subrogated to the right of the Desk Company, if any, against the defendant. Casualty Co. v. Oil Co., 265 N.C. 121, 143…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Flint & Walling Manufacturing Co. v. BeckettIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Pinnix v. ToomeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Council v. Dickerson's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Toone v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Haritha Nadendla v. WakeMedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  2. North Carolina State Ports Authority v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Davidson & Jones, Inc. v. County of New HanoverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Shoffner Industries, Inc. v. W. B. Lloyd Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Layman v. Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API