Legal Opinion

King v. Bonardi

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1966No. 605PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant John Thomas Bonardi assigns as error the denial of his motion for judgment of compulsory nonsuit made at the close of all the evidence.

On a motion for judgment of compulsory nonsuit, plaintiff’s evidence is to be taken as true, and considered in the light most favorable to him, giving him the benefit of every fact and inference of fact pertaining to the issues which may be reasonably deduced from the evidence. Plaintiff’s evidence must be considered in the light of his allegations to the extent the evidence is supported by the allegations. Defendant’s evidence which tends to impeach…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Lane v. BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Bridges v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Bell v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Greene v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Alva v. CloningerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Gibbs v. Carolina Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Jones v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Talbert v. ChoplinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API