Jones v. City of Durham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Chief Justice.
The sole question presented for review in this case is whether plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to show a genuine issue of material fact in order to survive summary judgment under a law enforcement officer vehicular gross negligence standard.
The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court and held that plaintiff’s forecast of evidence was insufficient to maintain a claim of *82gross negligence. Furthermore, the court held that defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Yancey v. LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Foster v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Bullins v. SchmidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Parish v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. WillettsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012
- Jones v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Jones v. City of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. RippyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Truhan v. WalstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.