Talbert v. Choplin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
“The purpose of summary judgment is to eliminate formal trials where only questions of law are involved by permitting penetration of an unfounded claim or defense in advance of trial and allowing summary disposition for either party when a fatal weakness in the claim or defense is exposed.” Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc., 296 N.C. 467, 470, 251 S.E. 2d 419, 422 (1979). “The device used is one whereby a party may in effect force his opponent to produce a forecast of evidence which he has available for presentation at trial to support his claim or defense. A party forces his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Greene v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- King v. BonardiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Yates v. ChappellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Draughon v. Harnett County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Draughon v. Harnett County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Adams, Kleemeier, Hagan, Hannah & Fouts, PLLC v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance v. MartinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Young v. GumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.