Legal Opinion

People v. Macerola

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1979PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*261OPINION OF THE COURT

Jasen, J.

The issue presented for our determination on these appeals is whether defendants were deprived of the effective assistance of counsel by reason of counsel’s joint representation of defendants at trial. While we had thought the applicable legal principles firmly established by prior decisions of this court, the circumstances of this case compel us to elaborate further on the safeguards which must be employed to ensure that a defendant is afforded adequate legal representation.

The pertinent facts are as follows: Defendants Maceróla and Letko were charged in a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. People v. GombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. FelderNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. CrumpNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. LombardoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. SanchezNew York Court of Appeals · 2013

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API