Legal Opinion

People v. Crump

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1981PublishedCited by 229 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

*825The trial court in this case made no inquiry on the record to ascertain whether the defendant was aware of the potential risks inherent in defense counsel’s joint representation of defendant and James Barclay, a codefendant. This failure to inquire is reversible error if there is a “significant possibility” of conflict of interest between defendant and Barclay. (See, e.g., People v Macerola, 47 NY2d 257, 264; People v Baffi, 49 NY2d 820, 822.) Here, defendant and Barclay were both…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. MacerolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. BaffiNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by229 opinions

  1. People v. FreemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. RecuperoNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. DevodierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. People v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. People v. EdmunsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

224 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API