People v. Lombardo
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*101OPINION OF THE COURT
Jones, J.
Use of the terms “scheme or business of making or collecting usurious loans” in section 190.42 of the Penal Law does not render the statute unconstitutional under the principle of void-for-vagueness, and the evidence in this record was sufficient to sustain defendant’s conviction under the statute. Receipt of a note from one juror that she could not “render a fair and just verdict in accordance with the Court’s instruction”, without more, did not mandate declaration of a mistrial. Finally, although it was error for the trial court not to have satisfied itself by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. GombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. MacerolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. AliceaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by100 opinions
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. BerroaNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. KonstantinidesNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. RecuperoNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.