Legal Opinion

Harper v. Lott Town & Improvement Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1921No. 193-3247PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Eourth Supreme Judicial District. Action by the Lott Town & Improvement Company against Corilla J. Harper and another, in which defendants filed a cross-action. Judgment for-plaintiff in part was on its appeal reversed, reformed and rendered by the Court of Civil Appeals (204 S. W. 452), and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

This is an action in debt and for foreclosure of vendor’s lien, instituted in the district court of Hidalgo county, Tex., by the Lott Town & Improvement Company, a corporation, against Corilla J. Harper and her sister, Ruth. The action was for the balance due upon a note for $7,642.60, executed by the Harper sisters on April 8, 1910, including interest and attorney’s fees, and which note had been given to said Lott Town & Improvement Company in part payment for the purchase of 250.16 acres of land situated in said county. Plaintiffs in error admitted the execution of the note for the amount…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hunt v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Thomas v. HammondTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Coverdill v. SeymourTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. J. H. Milliken & Co. v. Callahan CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Jones & Carey v. RisleyTexas Supreme Court · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. StraussCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. Martin v. HemphillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Eldora Oil Co. v. ThompsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. Whitehead v. WeldonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API