Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Strauss

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 21, 1922No. 1989PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.

This suit was instituted by appellees against appellant for damage occasioned by the failure to use diligence to ! produce and save oil from under 9.4 acres of land, and in permitting the oil to be i drained therefrom by operators on contiguous land or in the surrounding oil fields, and delay in drilling wells or a sufficient number, and for the abandonment of production of oil j from the land and the wells put down. The action is predicated upon two lease contracts and a contract between appellant and appellees and an assignment of two leases to appellant by appellee. July 27, 1918, N. C.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Texas v. HarringtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Grubb v. McAfeeTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Kahn v. KahnTexas Supreme Court · 1900

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Luling Oil & Gas Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. CapshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. PageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API