Legal Opinion

People v. Rayson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1961No. Crim. 7596PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Defendant was convicted of violating Penal Code section 337a, subdivision 1, bookmaking, and appeals from the judgment and order denying a new trial.

The sole contention upon appeal is that the physical objects (Exhibits 1 through 6), 1 received in evidence over the objections of appellant, were inadmissible because obtained through unlawful search and seizure.

The only testimony in the ease consists of that of Police Officer Lietz contained in the transcript of the preliminary hearing, upon which the cause was submitted in the trial court pursuant to stipulation of the parties. It establishes…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Willson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. SpicerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bielicki v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Bielicki v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. WillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. People v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API