Legal Opinion

Ian Davis v. Margaret Bradshaw

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 16, 2018No. 17-3262PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN K. BUSH, Circuit Judge.

A recantation is not always a good reason for a new trial. The recanting witness, in fact, may have told the truth the first time. Other evidence may corroborate the earlier testimony over the recantation. Such is the case here.

Ian Davis is currently incarcerated for the assault and murder of Marsha Blakely. His conviction was based on the testimony of an eye-witness, William Avery, Jr., who changed his story several times before Davis's trial. But corroborating evidence permitted the jury to credit Avery's trial testimony that implicated Davis.

Years later, Avery…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Arnold v. DittmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Freddie McNeill, Jr. v. Margaret BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  3. Carl Hubbard v. Randee RewertsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  4. Dominique Wallace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  5. Simmons v. WinnDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API