Legal Opinion

Carlisle v. Kanaywer

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1972No. Civ. 28234PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DRAPER, P. J.

Plaintiffs’ complaint seeks damages for the wrongful death of their husband and father. General and special demurrer to the complaint was sustained with leave to amend. Plaintiffs formally declined to amend, and judgment of dismissal followed. Plaintiffs appeal.

Although the complaint is in four counts, the essence of each is the allegation that decedent was, and was well known to defendant bar owners to be, “a habitual drunkard or an alcoholic and had lost the will power to resist the temptation when liquor was offered to1 him.” It is asserted that defendants nevertheless…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Brooks v. E. J. Willig Truck Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ewing v. Cloverleaf BowlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Vance v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1973
  4. Lucas v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Evans v. Celotex Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API