Hayes v. Browne
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
At the outset, we note that plaintiffs appeal is from an interlocutory order imposing sanctions for failure to complete discovery. Nevertheless, we choose to exercise our discretion and pass on the merits of plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal of the action. See, Routh v. Weaver, 67 N.C. App. 426, 428, 313 S.E. 2d 793, 795 (1984).
Plaintiffs first assignment of error is that the trial court lacked authority to dismiss the action. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 37(d) North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure provides in pertinent part:
If a party . . . fails to serve answers to interrogatories…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ca 79-3781 United Artists Corporation and Walt Disney Productions v. Harold FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Willis v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- American Imports, Inc. v. G. E. Employees Western Region Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Routh v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Laing v. LIBERTY LOAN CO. OF SMITHFIELD, ETC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roane-Barker v. Southeastern Hospital Supply Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Fulton v. East Carolina Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Graham v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Smitheman Ex Rel. Godwin v. National Presto Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Segrest v. GilletteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.