Legal Opinion

Segrest v. Gillette

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1989No. 8926SC98PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff does not assign error to any issues relevant to defendants Charlotte Memorial Hospital and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority’s alleged negligence. The judgment of the trial court that Amy Segrest’s death was not caused by negligence of these defendants is affirmed. The remainder of this opinion will address issues relevant to the alleged negligence of defendants Gillette, Greenhoot and Southeast Anesthesia Associates, P.A. (hereinafter Gillette, et al.).

Plaintiff first contends the trial court erred by excluding Amy Segrest’s death certificate from evidence. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sims ex rel. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. State v. WadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Carawan v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. GriffinArizona Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bumgarner v. ReneauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Cheek v. PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Essex Group, Inc. v. Express Wire Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Cheek v. PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API