Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1966PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

The appellant claims that the state failed to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he was in custody at the time of his escape. The appellant points out that the statute speaks in terms of an escape from “custody.” Sec. 946.42 (3) (a), Stats.

Mr. Thompson was transferred from the Wisconsin state reformatory at Green Bay to the correctional institution at Fox Lake, and it is his contention on this appeal that the state failed to prove that there had been compliance with the procedures and transmittals necessary for his transfer under secs. 46.11 (1), 53.18 (4) and 959.052, Stats. Thus, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sparkman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. Van BeekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Dascenzo v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. EscobedoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Finger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Gloudeman v. City of St. FrancisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  4. Gray v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Sartin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API