Legal Opinion

Dascenzo v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1965PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

I. Did the Trial Court err in Allowing the Case to he Tried by a six-member Jury, Without the Express Consent of the Defendant?

Sec. 957.01 (2), Stats., provides:

“At any time before verdict the parties may stipulate in writing or by statement in open court, entered in the minutes, with the approval of the court, that the jury shall consist of any number less than 12.”

The following colloquy took place between counsel and the court:

“The Court: As I understand, you have stipulated to a jury of six?
“Mr. Krause [Defense counsel] : Yes, Your Honor..
“Mr. Collins [Prosecution] : Yes, Your Honor.”

Defend…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Emery v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. State v. EsserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. TuttleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State Ex Rel. Burnett v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sparkman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Krueger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. LivingstonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Woodhull v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. Van BeekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API