Legal Opinion

Gray v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1968No. State 11PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

It is sometimes said in jest that an appellate court’s reference to “. . . the learned trial judge” precedes a reversal of the trial court’s reasoning and ruling. The suggestion is that trial judges, reading a reviewing court’s salute to their learning, are likely to say, “Here comes the reversal.” If we revived the phrase in this case, it would be only to acknowledge that a clear, concise and correct answer to each of the contentions of appellant is to be found in the memorandum decision of the trial judge in this case. Nothing new needs to be added. Nothing more remains that needs saying.

Def…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State Ex Rel. La Follette v. RaskinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. WatersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. Van BeekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. MerrittMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. Simos v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. EscobedoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. DiMaggioWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Dumer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API