Legal Opinion

Todd v. Orr

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 22, 1914No. 3463PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Action by James W. Orr against Samuel K. Todd and another. Judgment for defendants, which was vacated on motion of plaintiff. From an order overruling defendants’ motion to vacate all proceedings had therein since the rendition of the original judgment, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

On August 7, 1907, plaintiff instituted an action in ejectment against the defendants in the United States Court for the Western District of the Indian Territory. September 21st, thereafter, defendants filed their answer, and on the same day plaintiff filed his reply. Thereafter and on the 17th day of January, 1908, the case came on for trial before the district court within and for the county of Tulsa; said court being the legal successor of the United States Court for the Western District of the Indian Territory. The trial resulted in a verdict for defendants (which…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Matter of Application of La DueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Weber v. KirkendallNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. McAdams v. LathamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Schepp v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Southeastern, Inc. v. DotySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Parks v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Harjo v. BlackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API