Legal Opinion

United States v. Mills

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 16, 1917No. 1719PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7898 (T. D. 36363.)

1Opinion of the Court

De Vries, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

The merchandise consists of certain drapery nets and nettings. Eleven of the representative samples were made on the Nottingham lace-curtain machine and one on the Lever machine. They were classified for dutiable purposes as nets or nettings under the terms of paragraph 358 of the tariff act of 1913 providing for “⅜ * ' * nets, nettings, * * * all of the foregoing of whatever yarns, threads, or filaments composed, * * *.” The importers protested, alleging, among other matters not deemed important of recital, that the merchandise was dutiable…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. United States v. RiebeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  3. Nevin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. United States v. NordlingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  5. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Mills & GibbCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API