Legal Opinion
Tonya J. WIDEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 27, 1998No. 97-2897PublishedCited by 282 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARNES, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Tonya Wideman appeals from the district court’s grant of defendant WalMart’s motion for a judgment as a matter of law on her Title VII claims of hostile environment, constructive discharge, and retaliation. Wideman’s contention that the district court erred in granting Wal-Mart a judgment on her hostile environment and constructive discharge claims is meritless; the judgment with respect to those claims is affirmed without further discussion. However, for the reasons set forth below, we agree with Wideman’s contention that the district court erred in granting…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Andrew G. YARTZOFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lee M. THOMAS, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Little v. United TechnologiesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Jessica Lind Meeks v. Computer Associates International, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Jean G. Mattern v. Eastman Kodak Company and Eastman Chemical Company, D/B/A Texas Eastman CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Carl F. PAGE, Appellant, v. William J. BOLGER, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by282 opinions
- William J. Ray v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Rochon, Donald v. Gonzales, AlbertoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Shotz v. City of Plantation, FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Crawford v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
277 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.