Jean G. Mattern v. Eastman Kodak Company and Eastman Chemical Company, D/B/A Texas Eastman Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
The linchpin for this appeal is what constitutes an “ultimate employment decision” as required for a retaliation claim under Title VII of the CM Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a). Eastman Kodak Company and Eastman Chemical Company (collectively “Eastman”) contest the denial of a Fed. R.CrvP. 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law, a jury having found that Eastman had retaliated against Jean Mattem, its employee, but also having made two findings adverse to Mattern that limit her retaliation claim: first, that, although Mattern had been…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Marion Ray Mosley v. Officer M.D. CozbyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Carl F. PAGE, Appellant, v. William J. BOLGER, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Troy L. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DALLAS, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by318 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Cynthia A. Richardson v. New York State Department of Correctional Service, Auburn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- William J. Ray v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Jones v. Robinson Property Group, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
313 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.