Legal Opinion

Suskey v. LOYAL ORD. OF MOOSE LDG. NO. 86

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 1984No. 730PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying appellants’ Motion for New Trial following a jury verdict in favor of appellee Moose Lodge # 86. Appellants contend that they are entitled to a new trial because the court below erred in two regards: the trial judge failed to charge the jury on the presumption of intoxication set forth in the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Code (75 Pa.C.S. § 1547(d)(3)); and, the trial judge failed to ascertain that the jury’s verdict was clearly against the weight of the evidence. We find that appellants’ contentions have no merit and, therefore, affirm…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burrell v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Couts v. GhionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. BILLOW v. Farmers Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Schwarzbach v. DunnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Whyte v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Ackerman v. DelcomicoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Gottfried v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Schuenemann v. Dreemz, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Locke v. ClaypoolSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API