Legal Opinion
Dime Savings Bank v. Johneas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 26, 1991PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion granted, cross motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: In this foreclosure action, plaintiff appeals from a judgment which denied its motion for summary judgment and granted *1083the cross motion of defendant Ruth Johneas for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In dismissing the complaint, the court found that the bank had failed to name and serve a necessary party, Nicholas Johneas, as a defendant; that the bank had failed to give notice of default to the borrowers; and that the borrowers, having tendered payments that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Polish National Alliance of Brooklyn, U.S.A. v. White Eagle Hall Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Albertina Realty Co. v. Rosbro Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Hudson City Savings Institution v. BurtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Dime Savings Bank v. DooleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by9 opinions
- NC Venture I, L.P. v. Complete Analysis, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Central Mortgage Co. v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- East New York Savings Bank v. Austin Mall AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Brandt v. 47-49 Charles Street, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1993
- Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. JeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.