Legal Opinion

Dime Savings Bank v. Dooley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 23, 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a mortgage foreclosure action, the appeal is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated May 16, 1980, as granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for summary judgment. Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. In opposition to the motion for summary judgment in this action to foreclose a mortgage on their personal residence, appellants gnake two contentions. First, they maintain that plaintiff’s previous acceptance of *805late payments beyond the grace period raises a triable issue as to whether they were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Albertina Realty Co. v. Rosbro Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Ford v. WaxmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Home Savings of America v. IsaacsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. First Federal Savings Bank v. MiduraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Dime Savings Bank v. JohneasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Chase Mortgage Co. v. FowlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Southold Savings Bank v. CutinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API