General Instrument Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
This opinion addresses defendant’s motion filed July 27, 1992 to dismiss this civil action on the grounds that the applicable statute of limitations had expired prior to the filing of the complaint. We conclude that the motion should be treated as one for summary judgment pursuant to RCFC 56 and that, so considered, the motion should be granted.
I
Plaintiff is an electronics manufacturer. This claim arose from plaintiffs overpayment of federal income taxes. It is undisputed that plaintiff paid $411,512.28 in income taxes for the fiscal year ending February 28,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- United States v. WurtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Alexander Proudfoot Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
3Cited by9 opinions
- Computervision v. U.S. [Supplemental Order]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
- Coca-Cola Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Four Star Oil & Gas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Parker Hannifin Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.