Computervision v. U.S. [Supplemental Order]
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by the Appellant, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by the Appellee. The petition was referred first as a petition for panel rehearing to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition and response were referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:(1) The petition for rehearing is denied. 1(2) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.(3) The mandate of the court will issue on September 6, 2006.
Before…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Computervision Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Federal National Mortgage Association v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- General Instrument Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
3Cited by19 opinions
- Federal National Mortgage Association v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Waltner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Larson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Schroerlucke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.