Parker Hannifin Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
WHEELER, Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s January 27, 2006 motion, filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Court of Federal Claims, to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion is DENIED.
Background
Defendant contends in this tax refund ease that Plaintiff, Parker Hannifin Corporation, failed to file a timely administrative claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). Filing an administrative claim with the IRS is a jurisdictional prerequisite to commencing a tax…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Larson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- United States v. McFerrinDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- American Guardian Holdings, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- Paresky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018