Legal Opinion

Parker Hannifin Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 23, 2006No. 05-1041TPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

WHEELER, Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant’s January 27, 2006 motion, filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Court of Federal Claims, to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion is DENIED.

Background

Defendant contends in this tax refund ease that Plaintiff, Parker Hannifin Corporation, failed to file a timely administrative claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). Filing an administrative claim with the IRS is a jurisdictional prerequisite to commencing a tax…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Larson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. United States v. McFerrinDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
  3. American Guardian Holdings, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
  4. Paresky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API