In re Willhite
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
“What’s in a name?” Shakespeare asked. Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, Act II, Scene ii. “An individual’s name is important because it symbolizes familial lineage and heritage and represents one’s legal identity.” Kennedy-Sjodin, Keegan v. Gudahl: The Child’s Surname as a New Bargaining Chip in the Game of Divorce (1996), 41 S.D.L.Rev. 166.
As Justice Snell’s dissent in In re Marriage of Gulsvig (1993), 498 N.W.2d 725, 730, so aptly summarized, “The importance of names in society is of ancient origin. * * * Elsdon C. Smith in The Story of Our Names (1930) observed that except to the most…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bobo v. JewellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re the Marriage of GulsvigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- In Re Andrews by and Through AndrewsNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Change of Name of NewcombOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by19 opinions
- Paul Emma v. Jessica Evans (070071)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- In re Name Change of HandleyOhio Probate Court of Franklin County · 2000
- In re Change of Name for A.C.S.Alaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Leadingham ex rel. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
- D.W. v. T.L.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.