Hughes v. Hughes
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether either Section 152(e), Title 26, U.S. Code, as amended by the Tax Reform Act of 1984 (P.L. 98-369), or the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, precludes the domestic relations courts of this state from award*166ing the dependent child tax exemption to the noncustodial parent in a divorce proceeding. We answer such query in the negative, for the reasons which follow.
Section 152(e), applicable to tax years beginning after December 31, 1984, provides in pertinent part:
“(e) Support test in case of child of divorced parents, etc. —
“(…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Helvering v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cherry v. CherryOhio Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by40 opinions
- Nichols v. TedderMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- Bobo v. JewellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Gazo v. GazoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- In Re the Marriage of MilesnickMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Serrano v. SerranoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.