Legal Opinion

Murphy v. State

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 3, 2003No. 48891-1-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Coleman, J. —

Patrick Murphy and his family sued the State for damages they claimed were caused by the Washington State Pharmacy Board’s negligent disclosure of Murphy’s prescription records to the prosecuting attorney. The disclosure of those records resulted in Murphy’s prosecution for obtaining prescription drugs by deceit, but the criminal charges were dismissed because the Board failed to obtain a warrant before examining the records. In the civil trial, the jury found the Board was negligent and awarded Murphy damages he allegedly suffered when stress from the prosecution exacerbated his…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. York v. Wahkiakum School Dist. No. 200Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. York v. Wahkiakum School District No. 200Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. SurgeWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. WiedemanNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Murphy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API