Legal Opinion
State v. Wiedeman
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided July 12, 2013No. S-11-888PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. WIEDEMAN 193 Cite as
286 Neb. 193
to stabbing him. We therefore conclude that double jeopardy does not preclude a remand for a new trial and that the State may retry Trice on the second degree murder and manslaugh- ter charges. CONCLUSION We find plain error in the step instruction regarding second degree murder and manslaughter. R eversed and remanded for a new trial. Heavican, C.J., not participating. State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Kimberly D. Wiedeman, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed July 12, 2013. No. S-11-888. 1. Constitutional Law: Search and Seizure:…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. HendersonNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. DominguezNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. ShiffermillerNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. AveyNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. GoynesNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.