Legal Opinion
Murphy v. State
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 3, 2003No. 48891-1-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
62 P.3d 533 (2003)
115 Wash.App. 297
Patrick W. MURPHY and Susan B. Murphy, individually and as husband and wife; Tennille Murphy and Susan Murphy, as guardian ad litem for Muriel Murphy and Oliver Murphy, Appellants,
v.
STATE of Washington, Respondent.
No. 48891-1-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
February 3, 2003.
Paul J. Triesch, Seattle, Michael E. Tardiff, Assistant Attorney General DL & I, Olympia, for Appellants.
Mark S. Northcraft, Northcraft & Bigby, Seattle, for Respondent.
COLEMAN, J.
Patrick Murphy and his family sued the State for damages they claimed were caused by the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- York v. Wahkiakum School Dist. No. 200Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- York v. Wahkiakum School District No. 200Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. SurgeWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WiedemanNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. CarterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.