Legal Opinion

Fena v. Peppers Fruit Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 31, 1931No. 28,693PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

Plaintiffs are copartners engaged in the .wholesale fruit and vegetable business at Hibbing and Chisholm, Minnesota. Defendant (Peppers Fruit-Company) is a corporation organized November 3,1924, under the laws of the state of California, with an authorized capital stock of $250,000, represented by 2,500 shares of $100 each. It did not issue any stock, other than one qualifying share to each of five persons, and had no assets and did no business until July 1, 1928. Since that date it has been engaged in the selling and shipping…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Andres v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Du Vivier & Co. v. GalliceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  3. Acorn Lumber Co. v. Friedlander Box Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  4. Blumenthal v. SchneiderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Chicago Smelting & Refining Corp. v. SullivanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nielsen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. J. F. Anderson Lumber Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. In re Arbitration between Reif & Williams Sportswear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. O'Neil v. A. F. Oys & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Range Ice Fuel Co. Inc. v. Barnsdall Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API