Legal Opinion
Blumenthal v. Schneider
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided April 7, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.
In addition to the verdict of the jury that IT. Kamber & Co. Inc. assumed all the liabilities of H. Kam-ber & Co., sole trader, we have the testimony of Schwartz to the effect that when he was in New York and bought the bill of goods for which this action is brought, Mr. Kamber, previously the sole trader and then the president of H. Kam-ber & Co. Inc., assured him that if he would buy goods from the new company it would pay his. loss on the goods paid for but not received, and that on the strength: of such assurance he bought the goods. This is denied by Kamber, and he also denied the fact…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pratt v. Oshkosh Match Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Ziemer v. C. G. Bretting Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cyr v. B. Offen & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Alphonse Cyr, Jr. And Arlene Cyr v. B. Offen & Co., Inc., and Third-Party v. Blanchard Press, Inc., Third-Party Cyrenus Couture, Adm. Estate of Richard Couture v. B. Offen & Co., Inc., and Third-Party v. Blanchard Press, Inc., Third-Party Alphonse Cyr, Jr. And Arlene Cyr v. R. Hoe & Co., Inc., and Third-Party v. Rumford Printing Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Nielsen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Columbia Stamping & Manufacturing Co. v. ReichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- National Cash Register Co. v. NessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.