Legal Opinion
Range Ice Fuel Co. Inc. v. Barnsdall Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 24, 1941No. 32,472PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gallagher, Chief Justice.
Action for an accounting in which plaintiff appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial after findings in favor of defendant Barnsdall Refining Corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondent.
It appears that prior to January 1, 1933, Jonas Johnson and William LeSage, copartners, were doing business as Northwest Petroleum Company operating gasoline filling stations at Virginia and Hibbing. Thereafter, all their interest therein was transferred to corporations, acquired by them and named, successively, the Northwest Petroleum Company, Inc. and the Range…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sommers v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Dwinnell v. Minneapolis Fire & Marine Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Fena v. Peppers Fruit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Lawton v. FiskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- A. J. Whitman & Co. v. MielkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nielsen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- J. F. Anderson Lumber Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Kasal v. KasalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Barnsdall Refining Corp. v. Range Ice Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Barnsdall Refining Corp. v. Range Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.