Legal Opinion

Philip J. Bernstein Enterprises v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 26, 1973No. C.R.D. 73-38; Court Nos. R64/11956Published

1Opinion of the Court

Newman, Judge:

Defendant has moved for leave to file out of time a motion for a more definite statement in the form of amended complaints to be filed by plaintiff. No opposition or other response to defendant’s motion has been interposed on behalf of plaintiff. However, defendant’s motion must be denied.

It has been noted from the certificate of service attached to defendant’s motion that plaintiff’s attorneys of record, Cassel and Benjamin, have not been served with a copy of the motion at their office address, Suite 501 Flagler Federal Building, 111 Northeast 1st Street, Miami, Florida 33132,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Continental Forwarding, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Continental Forwarding, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. United States v. Continental Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  4. Continental Fwdg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. United States v. Continental Fwdg. Co.United States Customs Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API