Continental Forwarding, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
LaweeNce, Judge:
In this cause of action, appellant has invoked the jurisdiction of the court, pursuant to the provisions of section 2636, title 28, United States Code, by filing an application for review of the decision and judgment of the trial court, Continental Forwarding, Inc. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 579, Reap. Dec. 9910.
This controversy is familiarly referred to as the “MITI” case. That name derives from the initials of an agency of the Imperial Japanese Government, known as the Ministry of International Trade and Industry, which will be described in greater detail, infra.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Baar & Beards, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1958
- Continental Forwarding, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Baar & Beards, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Continental Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Continental Fwdg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Philip J. Bernstein Enterprises v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Sam Yeung Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- United States v. Continental Forwarding, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966