Legal Opinion
C.J. Betters Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 17, 1992No. 438-88 CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DAMAGES
WIESE, Judge.
BACKGROUND
In an earlier phase of this lawsuit, this court issued a decision holding that representations contained in a Prospectus to Bid and bid kit issued by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (relating to the sale of a rent-subsidized apartment complex) constituted warranties included in the contract of sale. The court further held that the Government breached these warranties and thus was accountable to the purchaser (plaintiff) for damages. A full account of the facts is set out in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Saul Freedman, D/B/A M. & E. Equipment & Parts Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Freedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Medwin Benjamin, D/B/A Benjamin's for Motors, Medwin Benjamin, D/B/A Mill Basin Repair Company, and Medwin Benjamin, Individually v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Ozark Dam Constructors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- C.J. Betters, Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- LaSalle Talman Bank, F.S.B. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Blue Lake Forest Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Blue Lake Forest Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- CJ. Betters Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.