Legal Opinion

Ozark Dam Constructors v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 11, 1955No. 143-54PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

The Government moves to dismiss the plaintiffs’ petition on the ground that it fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted. In the consideration of the motion, the allegations of the petition are taken as true, and the following recital of facts is paraphrased from the petition.

Ozark Dam Constructors is a joint venture composed of the other named plaintiffs, who are among the largest construction contractors in the United States. The joint venture was entered into for the purpose of making a contract with the Government, which acted through the Corps of Engineers,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. George A. Fuller Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  2. Kehm Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  3. Barling v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  4. Barling v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Saul Freedman, D/B/A M. & E. Equipment & Parts Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Fox Valley Engineering Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  3. Freedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Albano Cleaners, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  5. Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API