Legal Opinion

Mortimer v. Acquisition & Improvement District No. 36

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1951No. Civ. 18093PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by the county of San Diego from a judgment decreeing that Lorraine Claman, as special administratrix with general powers of the estate of Howard Claman, is the owner of certain coupons detached from specific bonds of Acquisition and Improvement District No. 36 of San Diego County; that she recover from the county of San Diego $1,204.24; and that upon payment thereof “said coupons shall then he returned to the defendant, County of San Diego.” The bonds were issued under the Acquisition and Improvement Act of 1925. (Stats. 1925, p. 849, as amended; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1931,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. ChildsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Anaheim Sugar Co. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Rice v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. County of Los Angeles v. RockholdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Southlands Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Vann v. City and County of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API