Pacific Acceptance Corp. v. Jones
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action to replevin an automobile. The answer asserts that the right of possession and title to the car were in the respondent. It also alleges that the car was worth $403.11, and prays for the return of the machine or the payment of its value.
May 23, 1925, Harmon & Graves Motor Company of Eureka, sold and delivered to C. A. Bland a Nash touring car upon an executory contract, by the terms of which the title remained in the vendor until the purchase price was fully paid. C. A. Bland was a minor, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parke v. FranciscusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Robinson v. American Fish & Oyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Boles v. StilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Kenny v. ChristiansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Rezos v. Zahm & Nagel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Navrides v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Carpenter v. DevittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Wargin v. WarginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947