NAT'L REPUBLIC BK. OF CHICAGO v. Proctor

Plaintiff filed a small claim action against defendant to recover the balance due on an installment note and security agreement, after the secured property was repossessed and sold or disposed. Defendant filed an answer and counterclaim. Plaintiff filed a motion to strike the counterclaim. The trial court entered an order striking the counterclaim, finding that there is no just reason for delaying enforcement or appeal. Defendant appeals from that order.

On September 15, 1976, defendant borrowed *2,080.99 from the plaintiff and executed a “Note and Security Agreement,” which agreement gave…