Legal Opinion

Commercial Discount Corp. v. Bayer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 13, 1978No. 77-218PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SULLIVAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff (secured party) appeals from the trial court’s direction of the verdict in favor of defendants (guarantors) and presents the following issues for review: (1) whether a secured party is required to give guarantors notice of a default sale; and (2) whether the trial court erred in directing the verdict at the close of plaintiff s case.

In March, 1969, plaintiff purchased a plastic injection molding machine for *15,500 and leased it to SAS Injection Molding, Inc., for five years with a total rental fee of *20,925. As a condition…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. T & W Ice Cream, Inc. v. Carriage Barn, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  3. AJ Armstrong, Inc. v. Janburt Embroidery Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  4. Woman's Athletic Club v. HulmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Hepworth v. Orlando Bank & Trust CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Lexmark International, Inc. v. Transportation InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. LototskyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Farmer City State Bank v. GuingrichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. McEntire v. Indiana National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Chemlease Worldwide Inc. v. Brace, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API