Legal Opinion

Chicago City Bank & Trust Co. v. Wilson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 27, 1980No. 79-1363PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mejda

Plaintiff brought this action as assignee of a retail installment contract to recover a deficiency due thereon. Defendant counterclaimed for damages he allegedly suffered. Following a bench trial, the court denied plaintiff any deficiency and ordered plaintiff to return defendant’s down payment, to pay defendant’s reasonable attorney’s fees, and to pay for defendant’s personal property loss. Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was denied and this appeal followed.

In the complaint plaintiff alleged that it was the assignee of a retail installment sales contract which had been executed by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hamer v. KirkIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Woodfield Ford, Inc. v. Akins Ford Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Maynard v. ParkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Maynard v. ParkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Tauber v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Foutch v. O'BRYANTIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Architectural Metal Systems, Incorporated v. Consolidated Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Lakeland Property Owners Ass'n v. LarsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Nika v. DanzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. First Galesburg National Bank & Trust Co. v. JoannidesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API