Van Noy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
Insurers have a general duty of good faith in dealing with their insureds. Here, in a class action lawsuit, the representatives of the class (hereinafter rep*489resentatives) have met their initial burden of producing issues of material fact concerning the good faith handling of the claims sufficient to survive summary judgment. In addition, a quasi-fiduciary relationship exists between an insurer and its insured. Here, there is also a question of fact as to whether State Farm Insurance Companies (State Farm) sufficiently disclosed pertinent facts to enable its insureds to protect their interests…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Coventry Associates v. Am. States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Anderson v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Anderson v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Van Noy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.