Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Wright

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 20, 1974No. 19775PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice:

In this action plaintiffs-appellants seek to recover damages allegedly caused by defendants impounding, concentrating and channeling surface water over land of the plaintiffs. The appeal is from an order of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Recognizing the established rule that, while surface water is regarded as a common enemy, an upper owner cannot collect surface water by any artificial means and cast it upon a lower landowner in a concentrated form, the court concluded that there was no evidence that the defendants had done so in this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thevenot ex rel. Estate of Thevenot v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Murphy v. HaganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. Rothrock Ex Rel. Estate of Rothrock v. CopelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Folkens v. HuntCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Shea v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
  5. Dalon v. Golden Lanes, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API