Rodewald v. Rodewald
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BOHLING, Commissioner.
This review in final analysis presents for determination the effect of the sale of a homestead in the probate court for the payment of the allowance to the homesteader’s widow for a year’s support under § 462.450, now V.A.M.S. §§ 474.250, 474.260. (Statutory references are to RSMo 1949 and V.A. *537M.S. unless otherwise indicated.) The litigants are the children of Albert J. and Edna Rodewald, now deceased. John and Fred Rodewald sued Christeena M. Rode-wald. Plaintiffs’ petition sought the cancellation of an administratrix’s deed in the father’s estate to the mother, Edna,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nettleton Bank v. Estate of McGauheySupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- McIntyre v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
- Sheetz v. KirtleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Macey v. StarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Monahan v. Estate of MonahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bosworth v. SewellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Stolldorf v. StolldorfWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Todd v. GarrisonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1976
- Baker v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Coons v. StokesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.