Legal Opinion

Rodewald v. Rodewald

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 14, 1957No. 45209PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOHLING, Commissioner.

This review in final analysis presents for determination the effect of the sale of a homestead in the probate court for the payment of the allowance to the homesteader’s widow for a year’s support under § 462.450, now V.A.M.S. §§ 474.250, 474.260. (Statutory references are to RSMo 1949 and V.A. *537M.S. unless otherwise indicated.) The litigants are the children of Albert J. and Edna Rodewald, now deceased. John and Fred Rodewald sued Christeena M. Rode-wald. Plaintiffs’ petition sought the cancellation of an administratrix’s deed in the father’s estate to the mother, Edna,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nettleton Bank v. Estate of McGauheySupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. McIntyre v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  3. Sheetz v. KirtleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Macey v. StarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Monahan v. Estate of MonahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bosworth v. SewellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Stolldorf v. StolldorfWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Todd v. GarrisonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1976
  4. Baker v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Coons v. StokesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API